1962 Lotus Elan vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 616 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (176 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elan | 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Elan | Lancer |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |