1962 Lotus Elan vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 950 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elan | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Elan | 6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |