1962 Lotus Elan vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (464 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 364 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 1339 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (637 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 499 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 1962 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1962 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lotus Elan | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Lotus | Dodge |
| Model | Elan | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 464 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 637 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 94 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1929 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3052 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |
