1962 Lotus Elite vs. 1994 Rover 400
To start off, 1994 Rover 400 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 400 (88 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover 400 weights approximately 580 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover 400 (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1994 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lotus Elite | 1994 Rover 400 | |
| Make | Lotus | Rover |
| Model | Elite | 400 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1215 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 88 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.7 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2560 mm |
