1962 Lotus Elite vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elite | 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Elite | Carisma |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1215 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1410 mm |