1962 Lotus Elite vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (182 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 1256 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elite | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Elite | Challenger |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2730 mm |