1962 Lotus Elite vs. 1996 Tata E220
To start off, 1996 Tata E220 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Tata E220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Tata E220 (148 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Tata E220 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Tata E220 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Tata E220 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1996 Tata E220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elite | 1996 Tata E220 | |
Make | Lotus | Tata |
Model | Elite | E220 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1215 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2810 mm |