1962 Lotus Elite vs. 2004 Samsung SM3

To start off, 2004 Samsung SM3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Samsung SM3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Samsung SM3 (94 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Samsung SM3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Samsung SM3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Samsung SM3 (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Samsung SM3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite. 2004 Samsung SM3 has automatic transmission and 1962 Lotus Elite has manual transmission. 1962 Lotus Elite will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Samsung SM3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: