1962 Lotus Elite vs. 2004 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2004 Toyota Corolla is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Corolla (90 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Corolla weights approximately 740 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Corolla (215 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Toyota Corolla will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elite | 2004 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | Elite | Corolla |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1215 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 82.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.7 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 55 L |