1962 Lotus Elite vs. 2004 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Passat (170 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Passat should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Passat weights approximately 810 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Passat (225 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Volkswagen Passat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elite | 2004 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | Lotus | Volkswagen |
Model | Elite | Passat |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1215 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 225 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.7 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 62 L |