1962 Lotus Elite vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lotus Elite (83 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lotus Elite should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lotus Elite | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Lotus | Ford |
| Model | Elite | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1216 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2490 mm |
