1962 Lotus Elite vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford C-Max (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 795 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elite | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Lotus | Ford |
Model | Elite | C-Max |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2648 mm |