1962 Lotus Elite vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP) has 221 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1820 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite. 2013 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1962 Lotus Elite has manual transmission. 1962 Lotus Elite will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elite | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Lotus | Cadillac |
Model | Elite | SRX |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1215 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 304 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.7 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.5 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 80 L |