1962 Lotus Elite vs. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (301 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elite | 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER | |
Make | Lotus | Dodge |
Model | Elite | CHALLENGER |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5023 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1449 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 72 L |