1962 Lotus Elite vs. 2013 Ford Focus
To start off, 2013 Ford Focus is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Focus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Focus (158 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Focus weights approximately 661 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Focus (198 Nm @ 4450 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lotus Elite | 2013 Ford Focus | |
| Make | Lotus | Ford |
| Model | Elite | Focus |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1215 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4450 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.7 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 12.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1321 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4534 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1466 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 47 L |
