1962 Lotus Seven vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1996 Mazda Midge is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Lotus Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lotus Seven (94 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lotus Seven should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Midge weights approximately 502 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven.
Because 1962 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lotus Seven | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Seven | Midge |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 972 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1400 mm |
