1962 Lotus Seven vs. 1999 Opel Omega
To start off, 1999 Opel Omega is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,171 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Opel Omega (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Omega weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Seven | 1999 Opel Omega | |
Make | Lotus | Opel |
Model | Seven | Omega |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 75 L |