1962 Lotus Seven vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Lotus Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Seven. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 314 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lotus Seven | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Lotus | MCC |
| Model | Seven | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 1810 mm |
