1962 Maserati 151 vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 1980 Volvo 164 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 3,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Maserati 151 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati 151 (355 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati 151 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 164.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Maserati 151 (487 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Maserati 151 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Maserati 151 | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | 151 | 164 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 3942 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 487 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3350 mm |
