1962 Maserati 151 vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 3,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Maserati 151 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati 151 (355 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2003 Volvo C70. (242 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati 151 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 620 kg more than 1962 Maserati 151.
Because 1962 Maserati 151 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati 151. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Maserati 151 (487 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo C70. (320 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1962 Maserati 151 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Maserati 151 | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Maserati | Volvo |
Model | 151 | C70 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 3942 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 487 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2670 mm |