1962 Maserati 151 vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 3,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Maserati 151 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati 151 (355 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati 151 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 655 kg more than 1962 Maserati 151.

Because 1962 Maserati 151 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati 151. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Maserati 151 (487 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1962 Maserati 151 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications: