1962 Maserati 151 vs. 2009 Tata Indica
To start off, 2009 Tata Indica is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 3,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Maserati 151 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati 151 (355 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 2009 Tata Indica. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati 151 should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Indica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Tata Indica weights approximately 110 kg more than 1962 Maserati 151.
Because 1962 Maserati 151 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati 151. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Tata Indica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Maserati 151 (487 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Indica. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Maserati 151 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Maserati 151 | 2009 Tata Indica | |
| Make | Maserati | Tata |
| Model | 151 | Indica |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 3942 cc | 1405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 487 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1005 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2410 mm |
