1962 Maserati Tipo 64 vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 595 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | 1953 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Maserati | Riley |
| Model | Tipo 64 | RM A |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2870 mm |
