1962 Maserati Tipo 64 vs. 2000 Plymouth Neon
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Neon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 2000 Plymouth Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2000 Plymouth Neon.
Because 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Plymouth Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | 2000 Plymouth Neon | |
Make | Maserati | Plymouth |
Model | Tipo 64 | Neon |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2650 mm |