1962 Maserati Tipo 64 vs. 2002 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2002 Skoda Octavia is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 2002 Skoda Octavia. (101 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2002 Skoda Octavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 580 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Because 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | 2002 Skoda Octavia | |
| Make | Maserati | Skoda |
| Model | Tipo 64 | Octavia |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2520 mm |
