1962 Maserati Tipo 64 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 705 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Because 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | Tipo 64 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2610 mm |
