1962 Maserati Tipo 64 vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (148 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Roadster weights approximately 440 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mazda Roadster has automatic transmission and 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 has manual transmission. 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | Tipo 64 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1838 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2270 mm |