1962 Maserati Tipo 64 vs. 2003 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2003 MCC ForTwo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 2003 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC ForTwo weights approximately 90 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | 2003 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Maserati | MCC |
Model | Tipo 64 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1810 mm |