1962 Maserati Tipo 64 vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 515 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Because 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | Tipo 64 | 3 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1349 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2680 mm |