1962 Maserati Tipo 64 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK

To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 5,437 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (574 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1108 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 has manual transmission. 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: