1962 Maserati Tipo 64 vs. 2004 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Murano. (245 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Murano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Murano weights approximately 1098 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Because 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | 2004 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Maserati | Nissan |
Model | Tipo 64 | Murano |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 1738 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |