1962 Maserati Tipo 64 vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP) has 247 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 104 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Maserati | MCC |
| Model | Tipo 64 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1810 mm |
