1962 Maserati Tipo 64 vs. 2013 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2013 Nissan Cube is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2013 Nissan Cube. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2013 Nissan Cube. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Cube weights approximately 632 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Because 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | 2013 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Maserati | Nissan |
| Model | Tipo 64 | Cube |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 1272 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2530 mm |
