1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 1980 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1980 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 710 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mazda Cosmo (151 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1980 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mazda R 360 | 1980 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | R 360 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 355 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |
