1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 825 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mazda R 360 | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | R 360 | Apollo |
Year Released | 1962 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2610 mm |