1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee (225 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1268 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee (407 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mazda R 360 | 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Mazda | Jeep |
| Model | R 360 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Size | 355 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 225 HP |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1648 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 87 L |
