1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (129 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (185 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mazda R 360 | 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | R 360 | CLK |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 78.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |