1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mazda R 360 | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | R 360 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |