1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 2003 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mazda R 360 | 2003 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Mazda | Dodge |
| Model | R 360 | Neon |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 355 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2650 mm |
