1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Outback (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Subaru Outback weights approximately 1176 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Subaru Outback (225 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2004 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mazda R 360 | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Mazda | Subaru |
Model | R 360 | Outback |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 225 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 79 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1556 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |