1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1598 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mazda R 360 | 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | R 360 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1978 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |