1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,996 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (228 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 1312 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (300 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mazda R 360 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | R 360 | C |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 2996 cc |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 82.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 66 L |