1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (653 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 637 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1368 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (856 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 834 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mazda R 360 | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | R 360 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 5800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 653 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 856 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 105 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 61 L |