1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S
To start off, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S would be higher. Both 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 and 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S are equipped with a 2,996 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S. (148 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 300 | 300S |
Year Released | 1962 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 85 L |