1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 1972 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1972 Triumph Stag is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1972 Triumph Stag. (124 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph Stag. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 730 kg more than 1972 Triumph Stag. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 1972 Triumph Stag | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
Model | 300 | Stag |
Year Released | 1962 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2550 mm |