1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (200 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1999 Acura CL.
Because 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 1999 Acura CL | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Acura |
Model | 300 | CL |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 65 L |