1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 286 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora.
Because 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 300 | Aurora |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 3473 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1644 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2900 mm |
