1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. Both 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 and 2002 BMW Z3 are equipped with a 2,996 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 530 kg more than 2002 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | BMW |
Model | 300 | Z3 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 51 L |