1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (206 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 365 kg more than 2003 Volvo C70.
Because 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | 300 | C70 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 68 L |