1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2007 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2007 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300.
Because 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2007 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volkswagen |
Model | 300 | Eos |
Year Released | 1962 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 55 L |